Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Light Pollution: Lake Elsinore Motocross Expands Its Operation into Nighttime

My thanks go out to current mayor of Wildomar, Bridgette Moore, for notifying me that a nearby motocross facility is modifying its operations. Their new hours will require lighting up to 10 pm. The initial study calls for no mitigation on lighting and also describes what may be the potentially worst type of light (in terms of glare, visual clutter, and light pollution) for any outdoor application: 30 portable, diesel-generator powered lighting units, with each unit consisting of four 1,000 watt fixtures and emitting 440,000 lumens (See http://www.maesco.com/products/hp_tower/hp_tower.html for a sample of this type of light).

Such lighting also violates Lake Elsinore's commendable municipal code on lighting:
17.112.040 Lighting.
All outdoor lighting fixtures in excess of 60 watts shall be oriented and shielded to prevent direct illumination above the horizontal plane passing through the luminaire and prevent any glare or direct illumination on adjacent properties or streets. Due to the City’s proximity to the Mount Palomar Observatory, the use of low pressure sodium lighting shall be encouraged. [Ord. 853 § 1, 1989; Ord. 772 § 17.38.040, 1986. Code 1987 § 17.38.040]. (See http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/lakeelsinore/.)

I like having a motocross track. I can hear it from my home, and though I'd prefer not to hear it in the evening, I'm ok with the extended hours if it meets a demand from our community. I do however, vehemently object to the choice of light fixture and that lighting mitigation was not considered in the initial study.
Not only is the fixture the most egregious light polluter available, due to glare, it is a poor choice in any application where motorists and pedestrians mix. Motocross patrons, the nearby communities and economic development areas, and the astronomical research community need a better solution.

I'm grateful to The City of Lake Elsinore for the opportunity to comment. Below the comments I submitted:

I believe the Initial Study for a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Lake Elsinore Motocross Facility Change in Operations (herein referred to The Declaration) is deficient in not addressing the following potential impacts of artificial lighting:
  • Impact on aesthetic enjoyment of the night sky by nearby communities
  • Degradation of a critical resource used in professional research
  • Creation of safety hazards from glare
  • Degradation of economic development recovery measures from light clutter
It is imperative that these effects be considered because the choice of lighting described within The Declaration has the greatest potential to maximize the above problems:

 …the proposed project would result in the use of portable, diesel-generator powered lighting. Lighting features proposed would consist of up to 30 lighting units, with each unit consisting of four 1,000 watt fixtures. The portable lighting fixtures will be mounted on standards measuring up to 30 feet in height. As needed, lighting would be provided between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. during November through March; 6:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. during the months of April through May, and October; and 7:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. during June through September. With the addition of nighttime lighting, the number of hours in which the facility could operate would increase. Depending on the time of year, the amount of hours added to daily operations will vary from several hours in the winter months, to no more than two hours during the summer. (From pages 7-8 from The Declaration; bold text is my emphasis)

From the description in The Declaration it is possible the lighting described is the same type of lighting typically used at construction sites for temporary lighting. These lights lack proper shielding and their nearly horizontal aim guarantees that the motocross lighting will be a community eyesore and hazard where visibility is concerned. The photograph below shows a hillside being lit by one portable light, similar to those described in The Declaration. Note that the background is an 800-foot slope being lit by light spilled beyond the lighting target. You can even see shadows of trees near the light projected onto the hillside

 Why Lighting Impacts should be considered the The Declaration:

  •  Impact on aesthetic enjoyment of the night sky by nearby communities: The boundaries of Lake Elsinore and Wildomar are interlocked, similar to the shape of jigsaw pieces. Unshielded light disperses in a radial pattern, and therefore, does not constrain itself to city boundaries. Light from Lake Elsinore dominates nighttime views to the north and toward the zenith as seen from Wildomar. What Lake Elsinore does or fails to do with lighting affects Wildomar. See Figures 1 and 2.
  •  Degradation of a critical resource used in professional research: Lake Elsinore and the Motocross Facility are located inside a 45-mile radius from Palomar Observatory, which is recognized under Riverside County Ordinance 655 as subject to regulation of light pollution for the protection of the observatory. Though Lake Elsinore has not adopted this or a compatible ordinance (Note: my error: I learned of Lake Elsinore's ordinance after submitting my comments later), artificial lighting still affects research opportunities a Palomar Observatory. What Lake Elsinore does or fails to do with lighting affects state-of-the-art scientific research being conducted locally. See Figure 3.
  • Creation of safety hazards from glare: Flood lighting that lacks proper shielding can create glare that interferes with motorists', bicyclists' and pedestrians' ability to see obstacles and each other. This can create traffic and personal safety issues. See Figures 10 and 11.
  • Degradation of economic development recovery measures from light clutter: The Motocross Facility is located next to an economic recovery area called the Lakeland Village/Wildomar Redevelopment Project Area (RDA). The lighting guidelines for the area are intended to reduce an affect called lighting clutter. Unshielded, bright lights will undermine their efforts. (Full disclosure, John Garrett is on the RDA committee and has been the primary influence on the lighting guidelines). See Figures 4 and 5.

 Mitigation Issues to Consider

All of the potential lighting impacts can be resolved with a "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation" rating if the following measures are taken:

  • Identify lighting tasks as Class I (Color rendition required), Class II (area, walkways, parking, and security while area is not occupied), or Class III (decorative).
  • For Class I, it is assumed that white light sources will be used. These should have full cutoff light fixtures. An exception may be for stadium style lighting, assuming that such lights have visors that greatly reduce the spillage of light beyond the target area. Note: Musco Lighting is a leader in this type of light fixture. See Figures 7 and 8.
  • For Class II and III, use full cut off fixtures where possible and narrow spectrum light sources, such as low-pressure sodium lamps (yellow-orange in color) or high-pressure sodium lamps (amber color). Some new LED lighting in amber colors is also a suitable alternative. See Figure 6.
  • Use downward lighting for all signs. See Figure 9.


Figure 1: Upward light from The City of Lake Elsinore is accentuated by clouds in this photograph. This photo was taken near Grand and Corydon with the camera pointing northward.

Figure 2: View from Wildomar near Grand and Corydon looking North on a cloudless night. The glow behind the tree is from the City of Lake Elsinore.

Figure 3: Northward view of Palomar Observatory's 200-inch telescope dome. Five-minute exposure at 1600 ISO. The light is coming from all the cities north of Palomar, which includes The City of Lake Elsinore.

Figure 4: Light clutter and glare. Photo taken at Mission Trails and Bundy Canyon of a building on the north side of Corydon, about ½ mile away. The lights create clutter and close up they create glare for motorists. These lights are on a property within The City of Lake Elsinore shine most of their light onto Wildomar.

Figure5: Boundary of Lakeland Village/Wildomar Redevelopment Project Area

Figure 6: Excellent Class II lighting at a business park on Corydon Street (within The City of Lake Elsinore). Note: The lights of these buildings were used a good example in the lighting guidelines of the Lakeland Village/Wildomar Redevelopment Project Area.

Figure 7: Stadium light with cutoff visors to constrain light to target area.


Figure 8: Stadium lights in use. Note that the beams show clear downward angle due to the visor.

Figure 9: Downward lighting of sign using new fixtures by Holophane Lighting. These lights conform to the Pima County standard, and save energy. (Photo from International Darksky Association)

Figure 10: Glare from the unshielded light prevents a pedestrian from seeing what is in the shadow. Photo was taken without a flash to simulate the human observation. (Photo from International Darksky Association)

Figure 11: A flash was used to show what the human motorist or pedestrian fails to see when glare is present. The person behind the truck is also in Figure 10. (Photo from International Darksky Association)


Anonymous said...

I'm sure I would also object to the additional noise pollution if I lived up there.

Does any really need to do motocross at night? Is there some advantage over the day-time?

jg said...

Hey Bill,
Your comment came in under a different topic so I moved it here as anonymous.

You're right in that no one needs to do motocross into the evening, but I'm willing to accept the operator's judgment as to there being a demand. I've heard talk of the track being too busy for some people.

I've had to intervene in neighboring riding: kids and adults conducting speed trials on my residential street with quads and dirt bikes; kids using the sidewalks for ramps (with motorcyles!). Agreeing to the late hours is my way of justifying when I have to call the police.